<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Changing thinking; changing practice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.meld.com.au/2009/03/changing-thinking-changing-practice/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.meld.com.au/2009/03/changing-thinking-changing-practice</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:06:53 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: IA Summit 2009 - A review in three parts &#171; Meld Consulting</title>
		<link>http://www.meld.com.au/2009/03/changing-thinking-changing-practice/comment-page-1#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>IA Summit 2009 - A review in three parts &#171; Meld Consulting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 14:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.meld.com.au/?p=300#comment-88</guid>
		<description>[...] as I wrote about earlier this year I&#8217;ve recognised for some time that I&#8217;m not an information architect although I had [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as I wrote about earlier this year I&#8217;ve recognised for some time that I&#8217;m not an information architect although I had [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel Flom</title>
		<link>http://www.meld.com.au/2009/03/changing-thinking-changing-practice/comment-page-1#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Flom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 04:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.meld.com.au/?p=300#comment-70</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the inspirational and timely piece. 

I also see the recent challenges as an incredible opportunity for user experience (UX) professionals, from research and analysis to interaction, information and interface design. The very tenets of UX--focusing on people, synthesising multifaceted needs (e.g. customers, frontline employees, management, shareholders), improving each interaction with the system/process, guaranteeing accessibility (including keeping cost of entry low) and establishing trust between all parties--aim to foster &quot;equity, fairness, sustainability, and stewardship&quot;.

However, I also see a need for our practice to take it up a notch when it comes to delivering the goods. Definitions, goals and tenets all help define an industry and provide clarity in approach, but it&#039;s the results that make or break us. As much as customers seek a more social-oriented, e-commerce platform or as employees seek a more accessible and useful intranet, it&#039;s the stakeholders on the other side that we need to satisfy. We need to put our money where are mouths--and minds and hearts--are. The business world will then begin to internalise and institutionalise UX values.

This means understanding which research techniques will provide the best set of data; keeping our findings objective; providing figures/measurements that support our inferences; involving the business in the design process; and most of all, delivering real value (increase in revenue, decrease in costs, acquisition of new customers, retention of existing customers). If our approach is true, the results will follow.

I&#039;m not implying that most of us in the UX industry are snake oil salesmen, but I have certainly come across some amazing examples of voodoo and wand-waving in proposals and executive presentations. It&#039;s almost as if the people we rely on throughout the process are also the ones we try to alienate. As the finance industry has recently learned (just Google &quot;john stewart jim cramer interview&quot;), an elitist, hands-off approach (&quot;Don&#039;t worry boys, leave the number-crunching and projections to us&quot;) can come back and bite you where it hurts.

I believe our call is to &quot;deliver real, significant, solutions&quot; to both users of a system and those financing it. However, our leadership and value in the business world and public sectors won&#039;t be demonstrated and substantiated until we deliver real, financial gains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the inspirational and timely piece. </p>
<p>I also see the recent challenges as an incredible opportunity for user experience (UX) professionals, from research and analysis to interaction, information and interface design. The very tenets of UX&#8211;focusing on people, synthesising multifaceted needs (e.g. customers, frontline employees, management, shareholders), improving each interaction with the system/process, guaranteeing accessibility (including keeping cost of entry low) and establishing trust between all parties&#8211;aim to foster &#8220;equity, fairness, sustainability, and stewardship&#8221;.</p>
<p>However, I also see a need for our practice to take it up a notch when it comes to delivering the goods. Definitions, goals and tenets all help define an industry and provide clarity in approach, but it&#8217;s the results that make or break us. As much as customers seek a more social-oriented, e-commerce platform or as employees seek a more accessible and useful intranet, it&#8217;s the stakeholders on the other side that we need to satisfy. We need to put our money where are mouths&#8211;and minds and hearts&#8211;are. The business world will then begin to internalise and institutionalise UX values.</p>
<p>This means understanding which research techniques will provide the best set of data; keeping our findings objective; providing figures/measurements that support our inferences; involving the business in the design process; and most of all, delivering real value (increase in revenue, decrease in costs, acquisition of new customers, retention of existing customers). If our approach is true, the results will follow.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not implying that most of us in the UX industry are snake oil salesmen, but I have certainly come across some amazing examples of voodoo and wand-waving in proposals and executive presentations. It&#8217;s almost as if the people we rely on throughout the process are also the ones we try to alienate. As the finance industry has recently learned (just Google &#8220;john stewart jim cramer interview&#8221;), an elitist, hands-off approach (&#8221;Don&#8217;t worry boys, leave the number-crunching and projections to us&#8221;) can come back and bite you where it hurts.</p>
<p>I believe our call is to &#8220;deliver real, significant, solutions&#8221; to both users of a system and those financing it. However, our leadership and value in the business world and public sectors won&#8217;t be demonstrated and substantiated until we deliver real, financial gains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

